In March this year, when the Goa government issued a draft notification to shift the academic year start to April instead of June, parents across the state raised their voices in protest - Letters were written, emails were sent, objections were submitted in response to the notification in the official gazette. Reasoned arguments were laid out - the extreme April heat, lack of school infrastructure, water and electricity shortages, and a glaring absence of consultation.
And yet—these objections were dismissed as being “without merit.”
Fast forward to July, and the consequences are plain to see. Children across Goa have been made to attend school through peak summer heat.
In a small but revealing parent survey conducted in March, over 80% of respondents rated the April heat as "highly uncomfortable." Several reported cases of dehydration, rashes, exhaustion. Most schools lacked even basic cooling facilities. Some classrooms had just two fans in a class of 50 students.
The question now is: Why was this done? And perhaps more urgently: Who will be held responsible?
And this is not the view of frustrated parents alone.
Just this week, the Supreme Court of India stated unequivocally that states cannot be compelled to adopt the NEP. Education is a concurrent subject—meaning states can adopt, adapt, or ignore central policies as they see fit, provided they uphold the rights of children.
Goa’s decision to push through a major change—against expert advice, without adequate preparation, and in open disregard for parental feedback—was not an obligation. It was a choice. And not a choice in favour of Goa's students and their well being.
Schools were not ready. No additional fans, no power backups, water shortages. Students struggled to concentrate. Teachers scrambled to revise old portions or start new ones mid-heatwave. For many, there was no academic calendar, no clear schedule—only confusion.
The state promised an "academic uplift" but delivered a logistical nightmare!
Goa had the autonomy to say no. It chose not to.
The NEP is a visionary policy—but only if implemented thoughtfully, sensitively, and with the people it’s meant to serve.
And yet—these objections were dismissed as being “without merit.”
Fast forward to July, and the consequences are plain to see. Children across Goa have been made to attend school through peak summer heat.
In a small but revealing parent survey conducted in March, over 80% of respondents rated the April heat as "highly uncomfortable." Several reported cases of dehydration, rashes, exhaustion. Most schools lacked even basic cooling facilities. Some classrooms had just two fans in a class of 50 students.
The question now is: Why was this done? And perhaps more urgently: Who will be held responsible?
It was not about NEP!
Much of the justification for this sudden change was couched in references to the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. But here’s the truth: NEP DOES NOT mandate an April start. The National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE 2023) allows flexibility. Nowhere does it require Goa to sync with the CBSE calendar or change its own.And this is not the view of frustrated parents alone.
Just this week, the Supreme Court of India stated unequivocally that states cannot be compelled to adopt the NEP. Education is a concurrent subject—meaning states can adopt, adapt, or ignore central policies as they see fit, provided they uphold the rights of children.
Goa’s decision to push through a major change—against expert advice, without adequate preparation, and in open disregard for parental feedback—was not an obligation. It was a choice. And not a choice in favour of Goa's students and their well being.
Ignored Warnings, Real Harm
In official submissions to the Directorate of Education, parents pointed out the obvious: April is the hottest month in Goa. The same Director who signed the notification mandating April School had, in fact, said in a media interview earlier that classes should not be held from March to May due to heat. So why the reversal?Schools were not ready. No additional fans, no power backups, water shortages. Students struggled to concentrate. Teachers scrambled to revise old portions or start new ones mid-heatwave. For many, there was no academic calendar, no clear schedule—only confusion.
The state promised an "academic uplift" but delivered a logistical nightmare!
Autonomy Must Come with Accountability
The Supreme Court has made it clear: states are free to decide their education paths, but they are also accountable for outcomes. This shift, framed as a step forward, has actually harmed student well-being, disrupted routines, and shaken public trust.Goa had the autonomy to say no. It chose not to.
What Now?
It’s time for the state government to admit its mistake and reverse/pause further rollout of this April calendar. They need to engage meaningfully with parents and teachers and provide data, and not just dictate terms to schools and parents. They need to address infrastructure gaps and put children’s health before administrative alignment.The NEP is a visionary policy—but only if implemented thoughtfully, sensitively, and with the people it’s meant to serve.
Comments